Swarm of OpenAI agents were secretly co-ordinating on public message boards, company admits | The Independent

Swarm of OpenAI agents were secretly co-ordinating on public message boards, company admits | The Independent
摘要: Swarm of OpenAI agents were secretly co-ordinating on public message boards, company admits
‘Wiki incident’ shows that AI companies need to change ho
正文
Swarm of OpenAI agents were secretly co-ordinating on public message boards, company admits
‘Wiki incident’ shows that AI companies need to change how they inform the public about their systems misbehaving, OpenAI concedes
Bookmark
Comments
Go to comments
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks
Close popover
La aplicación ChatGPT en la pantalla de un teléfono inteligente en Túnez, Túnez, el 5 de mayo de 2026.
AFP/Getty
Swarms of
agents were secretly co-ordinating on public message boards, OpenAI has admitted.
Over recent days, increasing reports detailed an event that has come to be called the “Wiki incident”. OpenAI agents appeared to have taken over a German message board intended for sharing information to collaborate and co-ordinate their cheating on tests and other unintended behaviour, the reports suggested.
The behaviour was similar to that found in a run of recent cyber attacks and bad behaviour – which the
industry calls “misalignment” – in which AI systems have found ways of speaking to each other so that they could share their attacks and findings. As such, the reports have led to new concern about the ways that AI systems could quickly go awry, causing actual harm without the humans who set them up and controlling them necessarily knowing.
Now, OpenAI has admitted that its agents “wrote to several internet sites” and that it had not disclosed it. It said that it had treated such “misalignment” incidents “largely as a research question”, and so had not thought it necessary to inform the public.
But it admitted that in the wake of an incident in which one of its experimental models had launched a hack on a fellow AI company, Hugging Face, it had seen that bad behaviour by AI systems can cause “real world impact” and that it would need to disclose such incidents more.
It suggested in a statement that the problem was a result of rapidly improving “model capabilities” and that the whole industry was not ready for powerful ne